New guidelines for the treatment of ASD and PTSD in children

Australian ASD PTSD GuidelinesDo not use psychological debriefing when a child has been exposed to a traumatic event such as assault or a major car crash.

And when you treat a child who has developed Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) due to trauma, do not use pharmacotherapy either (that is, not as a first line treatment).

Rather, apply the principles of psychological first aid in the direct aftermath of trauma and use trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy to treat PTSD.

These recommendations come from the brand new, very extensive Australian Guidelines for the Treatment of ASD and PTSD. For the first time, the guidelines include separate sections on children and adolescents.

How are the guidelines developed?

The guidelines are mainly informed by a systematic review of the literature and a staged process of expert consensus. People affected by trauma, clinicians and the public have also had varying levels of input.

A set of specific questions guided the systematic review. For example:

“For people exposed to trauma, do early psychological interventions improve outcomes compared to no intervention?”

followed by the question

“For people exposed to trauma, does any early psychological intervention confer any advantage over other early psychological interventions?”

Note that the systematic literature review only included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). It did not consider ‘lower level evidence’. As you will see below, in many cases not enough scientific research was conducted to come to robust treatment conclusions. As a result, a significant part of the guidance relies on expert opinion.

Little certainty about what is best practice regarding children

The recommendations in the guidelines have several levels, depending on the strength of their support. This support is a combination of empirical evidence and expert opinion.

ASD PTSD RecommendationsIn total, 18 recommendations (grade A to D) were made, of which 7 for children. In addition, the guidelines contain 9 Consensus Points (1 for children) and 76 Good Practice Points (9 for children).

Of the recommendations regarding children, none is of level A and only one of level B: we still have a lot to unravel…

The most important lessons

Rated ‘B’ is the recommendation that we should not offer psychological debriefing (e.g. a structured session that asks in depth about the experience and elated emotions) to children after a potentially traumatic event. The guidelines state that, in contrast, psychological first aid may be helpful, if mental health specialists are available for referrals.

Rated ‘C’ are three recommendations:

  1. For children with PTSD (from school age on), developmentally appropriate Trauma-Focused CBT should be considered
  2. Individual interventions should be considered in preference to group interventions
  3. When several children are exposed to the same event (e.g. a disaster), a school-based CBT intervention should be considered

The first recommendation may not be a surprise as trauma-focussed CBT has been the most studied trauma intervention for children. However, based on the meta-analysis by Rodenburg et al., I had expected to see Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) as a recommendation as well. In contrast to the recent World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines, the Australian guidelines considered the evidence for EMDR not strong enough.

Although rated ‘C’, the recommendation to prefer individual interventions over group interventions seems to be weak. It appears to be based on two studies, one of which did not find an effect. The second study compared individual psychoanalytical psychotherapy to multi-session group therapy with psycho-education and psychotherapy elements for sexually abused girls, and reported better outcomes for the individual psychotherapy. However, the conditions differed on content, format, and number of sessions (up to 30 vs. up to 18), which makes it very difficult to come to conclusions. The WHO guidelines recommend both individual and group therapy.

Rated ‘D’ are a further three recommendations related to the use of pharmacotherapy with children and adolescents. The guidelines strongly convey the message that we should first try psychotherapy, in particular trauma-focussed CBT:

  1. Pharmacotherapy should not be used as a universal intervention to prevent PTSD in children
  2. Pharmacotherapy should not be used as a routine first treatment of PTSD in children
  3. Pharmacotherapy should not be used routinely as an adjunct to TF-CBT for children

General guidelines with regard to working with children after trauma

The ‘Good Practice Points’ provide some more general guidance on assessment and psychological care. For example:

  1. Asking whether a child has been exposed to trauma should be a routine part of any psychiatric assessment.
  2. When assessing PTSD symptoms, children and adolescents should be asked directly about their symptoms, separately from their parents.
  3. Parents may find it difficult to support their child due to their own stress reactions; clinicians should be aware of this and respond accordingly.

Resources

The Australian guidelines are freely available online. The website has a wealth of information and resources: the full guidelines, all appendices, short guides for practitioners and parents, and child/youth-centered materials.

References:

Rodenburg R, Benjamin A, de Roos C, Meijer AM, & Stams GJ (2009). Efficacy of EMDR in children: a meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 29 (7), 599-606 PMID: 19616353

Salloum A, & Overstreet S (2008). Evaluation of individual and group grief and trauma interventions for children post disaster. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 37 (3), 495-507 PMID: 18645741

Trowell J, Kolvin I, Weeramanthri T, Sadowski H, Berelowitz M, Glaser D, & Leitch I (2002). Psychotherapy for sexually abused girls: psychopathological outcome findings and patterns of change. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 180, 234-47 PMID: 11872516

What's your view?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s